{"id":45254,"date":"2020-04-19T15:12:04","date_gmt":"2020-04-19T19:12:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/?p=45254"},"modified":"2020-04-19T16:59:15","modified_gmt":"2020-04-19T20:59:15","slug":"rae-johnson-at-christopher-cutts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/?p=45254","title":{"rendered":"Rae Johnson at Christopher Cutts"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Currently\non display at Christopher Cutts Gallery are some of the key paintings of Rae\nJohnson under the title <em>Angels and\nMonsters: A Selection of Paintings from 1979 to 2019<\/em>. Alas, due to the\nhealth crisis they are not on public view. Viewings are by appointment only.\nThis is not only an inconvenience but also very regrettable given the\nimportance of the show. Johnson is a veteran of the Toronto art scene, having studied,\nlived, worked or shown in the city since 1975. She was also a professor at OCAD\nU for many years, where long ago she was my teacher. In the 1980s she played a\ncentral role in promoting and reinvigorating figurative painting as a founding\nmember of the influential collective ChromaZone. But what makes this exhibition\nespecially poignant is the fact that she has been stricken by a serious illness\nwhich has ended her ability to make art any more. This show \u2013 along with a\npossible second part later in the year \u2013 is, in other words, a retrospective of\nher long and distinguished career. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/rsz_instal_deathofthechild.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/rsz_instal_deathofthechild.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-45250\" width=\"320\" height=\"218\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:center\">Installation view with Death of the Child (left) and Madonna TV (right)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While the paintings date from 1979 \u2013 the year prior to her graduation from OCA \u2013 to last year, they all belong to either the first six years of her professional career or her output over the last three years or so. Johnson has been a prolific painter whose work has spanned all of these four decades, and many of the works during the intervening period will hopefully be on display as part of a second instalment. What we see here is a selection of works that represent her early career, which was a particularly turbulent time in her life. The later works are included because Johnson feels that they point to a closure. Her work, she believes, \u2018has come full circle\u2019 as she puts it. Indeed, there is a detectable kinship between these early and late works.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/rsz_instalangelinthepalace.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/rsz_instalangelinthepalace.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-45249\" width=\"321\" height=\"215\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:center\">Installation view with (L-R): Two Women Night, Angels in the Palace and Angel in the Rivoli<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Johnson\u2019s first sustained foray into painting was on the theme of pornography. She began producing these works while she was still a student, inspired by her time in New York city as part of OCA\u2019s erstwhile independent study program there. She became preoccupied with pornography because of its violent debasement of women. She attacked the subject with immense energy, producing a great many studies in acrylic in a short period of time. One example is her <em>Empire State<\/em> that depicts the antagonists as alienated souls in absurd juxtaposition. As with all these works it possesses a disturbing psychological aura. And this psychological dimension soon became the overarching ethos of her work quite generally. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/rsz_empire_state.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/rsz_empire_state.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-45247\" width=\"220\" height=\"244\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:center\">Empire State, 1979, acrylic on paper, 28.5 x 25.5 inches <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Around this time Johnson avidly studied the writings of Austrian psychologist Carl Jung. She was particularly impressed by Jung\u2019s notion of the archetype, that is, a fundamental mental image \u2013 idea \u2013 &nbsp;innately shared by us all. As well, she was very sympathetic with his notion that there is no real distinction between the psychic and the physical \u2013 both are aspects of the world we live in. These two notions have guided her approach to image making ever since. A great deal of the time she has aimed to bring out the psychic, to show what lies behind the physical world of appearances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Angel-in-the-Rivoli.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Angel-in-the-Rivoli.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-45251\" width=\"311\" height=\"246\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:center\"> Angel in the Rivoli, 1983, oil on canvas, 66 x 84 inches <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The one archetype Johnson adopted above all has been that of the madonna or the female angel that represents woman as sacred. She contrasted this image with that of the profane world of the everyday. Hence we see the madonna-like figure appear in bars, e.g., in <em>Angel in the Rivoli<\/em> or at the foot of the lovers\u2019 bed in <em>Anima, Animus<\/em>. In this latter painting, the male lover is depicted as wrapped in plastic, echoing the theme of the often unspoken violence of sexuality. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/AnimaAnimus.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/AnimaAnimus.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-45252\" width=\"320\" height=\"223\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:center\"> Anima, Animus, 1981, oil on canvas, 67 x 97.5 inches <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This violent undertone is most notably brought out in a series of works done in 1984, e.g., <em>I Can Hear It Breathing<\/em>. These are based on a vivid dream she experienced in which she is chased by a dark predatory monster that seems intent on raping her. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/I-Can-Hear-It-Breathing.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/I-Can-Hear-It-Breathing.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-45253\" width=\"239\" height=\"242\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:center\"> I Can Hear it Breathing, 1984, oil on canvas, 32 x 32 inches  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What is particularly pronounced in these paintings is her agitated fluid brushwork. She paints with urgency, as if racing to get down the evanescent image before her mind. Here she renounces any concern with verisimilitude or ornamentation. As a result many of her paintings cannot be described as beautiful in the classical sense of being deliberately pleasing to the eye. Rather she has always aimed for an honesty \u2013 to show how life feels in all its rawness. What draws the viewer in is the paintings\u2019 psychological energy. And her rendering of the psychical cannot be achieved by strictly copying the physical. At the same time, however, she cannot discard physical appearance. In this sense her work has been a constant struggle to balance these two elements. It is this tension that often makes her work gripping. Hers is a powerful unique voice, wonderfully showcased by Christopher Cutts\u2019 judicious selection. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/rsz_nightgamesatparadise_1984.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artoronto.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/rsz_nightgamesatparadise_1984.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-45248\" width=\"359\" height=\"227\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:center\"> Night Games at the Paradise, 1984, oil on canvas, 84 x 132 inches <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Hugh Alcock<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Images are courtesy of Christopher Cutts Gallery<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>*Exhibition information:\u00a0Rae Johnson, <em>Angels and Monsters: A Selection of Paintings from 1979 to 2019<\/em>, March 21 &#8211; April, 2020, Christopher Cutts Gallery, 21 Morrow Ave, Toronto. By appointment only. View it online <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cuttsgallery.com\/\">http:\/\/www.cuttsgallery.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><strong>by Hugh Alcock<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It is the tension between the physical and the psychological that makes her work gripping. Hers is a powerful unique voice, wonderfully showcased by Christopher Cutts\u2019 judicious selection. <\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link-p\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/?p=45254\">Read more &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":45260,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,221],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-features","category-hugh-alcock"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=45254"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45254\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45264,"href":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45254\/revisions\/45264"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/45260"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=45254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=45254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v2.artoronto.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=45254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}